Avaya Definity SI Maintenance Manual page 1463

DS1-BD (DS1 Interface Circuit Pack)
Table 10-247. TEST #1212 CPE Loopback Jack Test — Continued
Error Test
Code Result
2000 ABORT
2 FAIL
555-233-123
Description/Recommendation
Response to the test was not received within the allowable time
period. This may be due to hyperactivity. Error type 1538 in the
error log indicates hyperactivity. The hyperactive circuit pack is out
of service and one or more of the following symptoms may be
exhibited.
1. The DS1-BD tests (such as test 138 and test 139) are aborting
with error code 2000.
2. The tests run on the ports of this circuit pack are returning a no
board result.
3. A busyout or a release command has no affect on the test
results.
4. A list config command shows that the circuit pack and the
ports are properly installed.
NOTE:
When hyperactivity occurs, the circuit pack is isolated from
the system, and all of the trunks for this circuit pack are
placed into the out of service state. The system will try to
restore the circuit pack within 15 minutes. When no faults
are detected for 15 minutes, the DS1 interface circuit pack is
restored to normal operation. All of the trunks for the DS1
interface circuit pack are then returned to the in service
state. Hyperactivity is often caused by the associated facility.
In such a case, faults (such as slips, misframes, or blue
alarms) would be entered in the error log. In addition, many
hardware errors would be logged against the associated
trunk circuits. If the facility is OK and the error occurs again
after 15 minutes, escalate this problem.
The CLJ-LB test failed because it was not set up properly. The DS1
interface pack could not successfully put the CPE loopback jack
into loopback mode.
1. Rerun the test ds1-loop UUCSS
cpe-loopback-jack-test-begin command.
2. If the test continues to fail, the problem could be with the
TN767E board, the CPE loopback jack equipment, or
somewhere between. Run the test ds1-loop UUCSS
ds1/csu-loopback-tests command to determine if the
loopback tests that are closer to the TN767E board are
successful. If any of these tests fail, follow the maintenance
strategy that is associated with the test that fails.
Continued on next page
Issue 4 May 2002 10-677