Reply from 192.168.2.2: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=253 time=36 ms
--- 192.168.2.2 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 36/52/61 ms
[CE2] ping 192.168.1.2
PING 192.168.1.2: 56
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=1 ttl=253 time=38 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=2 ttl=253 time=61 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=3 ttl=253 time=74 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=4 ttl=253 time=36 ms
Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=56 Sequence=5 ttl=253 time=35 ms
--- 192.168.1.2 ping statistics ---
5 packet(s) transmitted
5 packet(s) received
0.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 35/48/74 ms
The sample output shows that CE 1 and CE 2 can reach each other.
7)
Verify the configuration
Perform the display mpls lsp verbose command on PE 1. You can find an LSP with LspIndex 2050.
This is the LSP, that is, the MPLS TE tunnel, established using RSVP-TE.
[PE1] display mpls lsp verbose
------------------------------------------------------------------
LSP Information: RSVP LSP
------------------------------------------------------------------
No
IngressLsrID
LocalLspID
Tunnel-Interface
Fec
Nexthop
In-Label
Out-Label
In-Interface
Out-Interface
LspIndex
Tunnel ID
LsrType
Bypass In Use
BypassTunnel
Mpls-Mtu
No.
IngressLsrID
LocalLspID
Tunnel-Interface
data bytes, press CTRL_C to break
:
1
:
2.2.2.2
:
1
:
Tunnel1
:
3.3.3.3/32
:
10.0.0.2
:
NULL
:
3
:
----------
:
Vlan-interface2
:
2050
:
0x22004
:
Ingress
:
Not Exists
:
Tunnel Index[---]
:
1500
:
2
:
3.3.3.3
:
1
:
Tunnel1
1-72