Abbott i-STAT 1 System Manual page 563

Hide thumbs Also See for i-STAT 1:
Table of Contents

Advertisement

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Standards for Microhematocrit Determination
1.
CLSI. Procedure for Determining Packed Cell Volume by the Microhematocrit Method; Approved
Standard - Third Edition. CLSI document H7-A3 [ISBN 1-56238-413-9]. CLSI, 940 West Valley
Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898, USA 2000.
Effect of K
EDTA on Cell Size
3
2.
Sears D, Charache S, Perlstein M: Electronic blood cell counters: Faulty calibration due to type
and amount of anticoagulant in collection tubes. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109:247-249, 1985.
3.
Gotch F, Torres L, Evans M, Keen M, Metzner K, Westpal D, Polascegg H: Comparison of conduc-
tivity measured hematocrit to microhematocrit. ASAIO Transactions 37:M138-M139, 1991.
4.
Salem M, Chernow B, Burke R, Stacey J, Slogoff M, Sood S: Bedside diagnostic blood testing:
Its accuracy, rapidity, and utility in blood conservation. JAMA 266:382-389, 1991.
Trapped Plasma Interference on Microhematocrit Determinations
5.
Chaplin H, Mollison PL: Correction for plasma trapped in the red cell column of the hematocrit.
Blood 7:1227-1238, 1952.
6.
Savitz D, Sidel VW, Solomon AK: Osmotic properties of human red cells. J Gen Phys 48:79 94,
1964.
7.
Dosik H, Prasad B: Coulter S hematocrit and microhematocrit in polycythemic patients. Amer J
Hemat 5:51-54, 1978.
8.
Penn D, Williams PR, Dutcher TF, Adair RM: Comparison of hematocrit determinations by micro-
hematocrit and electronic particle counter. Am J Clin Pathol 72:71-74, 1979.
9.
Fairbanks, VF: Nonequivalence of automated and manual hematocrit and erythrocyte indices. Am
J Clin Pathol 73:55-62, 1980.
10a. Pearson TC, Guthrie DL: Trapped plasma in the microhematocrit. Am J Clin Pathol 78:770-
772,1982.
10b. Bull B, Hay K: Is the Packed Cell Volume (PCV) Reliable? Lab. Hematology 7:191-196, 2001.
Mean Cell Hemoglobin Concentration Interference on Automated Hematology Analyzers
11.
Mohandas N, Clark MR, Kissinger S, Bayer C, Shohet SB: Inaccuracies associated with the au-
tomated measurement of mean cell hemoglobin concentration in dehydrated cells. Blood 56:125-
128, 1980.
12.
Arndfred T, Kristensen SD, Munck V: Coulter Counter model S and model S-plus measurements
of mean erythrocyte volume (MCV) are influenced by the mean erythrocyte haemoglobin concen-
tration (MCHC). Scand J Clin Lab Invest 41:717-721, 1981.
13.
Arndfred T, Dyerberg J: MCV and MCHC on the Coulter S-plus. Med Lab Science 42:298, 1985.
14.
Crawford JM, Lau YR, Bull B: Calibration of hematology analyzers. Arch Pathol Lab Med 111:324-
327, 1987.
15.
Bull B: The Validity of the MCHC by various analyzers. Presentation at the 1992 ASCP meeting:
Las Vegas, Nevada.
Osmolality Interference on Automated Hematology Analyzers
16.
Beautyman W, Bills T: Osmotic error in measurements of red cell volume. Lancet 2:905-906,1974.
17.
Beautyman W, Bills T: Hematocrit unchanged by hemodilution. N Engl J Med 45:293, 1975.
Art: 714261-01D
Rev. Date: 10-Jan-11
5

Advertisement

Table of Contents
loading

Table of Contents