Intel BX80623G530 Specification page 32

2nd generation intel core processor family desktop, intel pentium processor family desktop, and intel celeron processor family desktop, specification update
Table of Contents

Advertisement

BJ38.
FP Data Operand Pointer May Be Incorrectly Calculated After an FP
Access Which Wraps a 4-Gbyte Boundary in Code That Uses 32-Bit
Address Size in 64-bit Mode
Problem:
The FP (Floating Point) Data Operand Pointer is the effective address of the operand
associated with the last non-control FP instruction executed by the processor. If an 80-
bit FP access (load or store) uses a 32-bit address size in 64-bit mode and the memory
access wraps a 4-Gbyte boundary and the FP environment is subsequently saved, the
value contained in the FP Data Operand Pointer may be incorrect.
Implication:
Due to this erratum, the FP Data Operand Pointer may be incorrect. Wrapping an 80-bit
FP load around a 4-Gbyte boundary in this way is not a normal programming practice.
Intel has not observed this erratum with any commercially available software.
Workaround:
If the FP Data Operand Pointer is used in a 64-bit operating system which may run code
accessing 32-bit addresses, care must be taken to ensure that no 80-bit FP accesses
are wrapped around a 4-Gbyte boundary.
Status:
For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes.
BJ39.
FP Data Operand Pointer May Be Incorrectly Calculated After an FP
Access Which Wraps a 64-Kbyte Boundary in 16-Bit Code
Problem:
The FP (Floating Point) Data Operand Pointer is the effective address of the operand
associated with the last non-control FP instruction executed by the processor. If an 80-
bit FP access (load or store) occurs in a 16-bit mode other than protected mode (in
which case the access will produce a segment limit violation), the memory access
wraps a 64-Kbyte boundary, and the FP environment is subsequently saved, the value
contained in the FP Data Operand Pointer may be incorrect.
Implication:
Due to this erratum, the FP Data Operand Pointer may be incorrect. Wrapping an 80-bit
FP load around a segment boundary in this way is not a normal programming practice.
Intel has not observed this erratum with any commercially available software.
Workaround:
If the FP Data Operand Pointer is used in an operating system which may run 16-bit FP
code, care must be taken to ensure that no 80-bit FP accesses are wrapped around a
64-Kbyte boundary.
Status:
For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes.
BJ40.
Spurious Interrupts May be Generated From the Intel
Engine
Problem:
If software clears the F (Fault) bit 127 of the Fault Recording Register (FRCD_REG at
offset 0x208 in Remap Engine BAR) by writing 1b through RW1C command (Read Write
1 to Clear) when the F bit is already clear then a spurious interrupt from Intel
®
(Intel
Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) Remap Engine may be observed.
Implication:
Due to this erratum, spurious interrupts will occur from the Intel VT-d Remap Engine
following RW1C clearing F bit.
Workaround:
None identified.
Status:
For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes.
32
®
VT-d Remap
®
VT-d
Specification Update

Advertisement

Table of Contents
loading

Table of Contents