Honeywell AUTOMATIC CONTROL SI Edition Engineering Manual page 299

For commercial buildings
Table of Contents

Advertisement

LAB AIRFLOW
AIRFLOW
SENSOR
CONTROLLER PANEL
DAMPER
ACTUATOR
OR AIR
VALVE
AIRFLOW
SENSOR
S U P
P L Y
A I R
G E
E X
S U P
P L Y
A I R
T O
C O
S U
R R
A I R
I D O
R
L A B
Fig. 46. Airflow Tracking Control.
Airflow sensors located in all supply and exhaust ducts
provide flow signals which can be compared by a controller.
Sensor locations must meet the manufacturers minimum
installation guidelines, such as velocity range and length of
straight duct before and after the sensor, to ensure accuracy.
Materials and finishes for sensors in exhaust ducts exposed to
corrosive fumes must be carefully selected.
If future flexibility and changing lab configurations are
important considerations, then flow sensor location, duct size,
supply airflow rate, and control system design should all include
capabilitiy to be modified in the future.
A characteristic of airflow tracking is stability of the system in
the face of breaches to the lab envelope. This is most often lab
door openings. In a laboratory maintained at a negative pressure,
the space static pressure increases and the air velocity through all
openings drops significantly when a door opens. Figure 47 shows
a laboratory example with a single fume hood, a single door 1m
2
wide x 2m high (2m
), and a crack area estimated at 0.05 m
the fixed airflow tracking differential is 0.1 m
velocity through the cracks would be 2.0 m/s which is more than
adequate for containment. However, when the door opens, the
average velocity in this example decreases to 0.05 m/s which is
marginal to inadequate for containment.
However, the ability of the tracking system to quickly
(usually within several seconds) react and compensate for door
openings and other breaches is a positive characteristic of this
control method.
ENGINEERING MANUAL OF AUTOMATIC CONTROL
DAMPER ACTUATOR
OR AIR VALVE
E X H
A U S
A I R
A I R
D A M
F L O
P E R
S E N
A C T
W
S O
U A T
O R
R
O R
A I R
L
R A
V A L
N E
T
U S
V E
H A
A I R
L Y
P P
T O
VELOCITY
SENSOR
OR
SASH
SENSOR
M12215
3
/s, the average
BUILDING AIRFLOW SYSTEM CONTROL APPLICATIONS
CRACK AREA = 0.05 m
SUPPLY
3
0.4 m
/s
T
2
DOOR
2 m
DOOR CLOSED
VELOCITY = 0.1
Fig. 47. Airflow Tracking Example with
Door Closed and Opened.
Supply duct pressure and building pressurization control are
simpler and more stable with airflow tracking because they are
less affected by this type of unexpected upset. The supply duct
pressure control remains stable due to fewer disruptions. Building
pressurization, defined as the difference between total air leaving
the building and the total air entering, remains the same.
Direct pressure control (Fig. 48) provides the same control
function as airflow tracking but its characteristics are quite
different. Direct space pressurization control senses the
differential pressure between the space being controlled and a
reference space which is usually an adjacent space or hallway.
Figure 49 shows a similar example of negative space
pressurization utilizing direct pressure control. If the airflow
through the hood is 0.5 m
the supply airflow when the door is opened, the average velocity
through openings drops from 2.0 m/s to 0.25 m/s.
LAB AIRFLOW
CONTROLLER PANEL
SUPPLY AIR
DAMPER
ACTUATOR
S U P
P L Y
A I R
2
. If
D I F
F E R
P R E
S S U
S E N
S U P
S O
P L Y
A I R
T O
C O
R R
I D O
R
Fig. 48. Direct Pressure Control.
289
2
3
0.7 m
/s
FUME HOOD
DIFFERENTIAL = EXHAUST – SUPPLY
= 200 CFM
DOOR OPENED
0.05
VELOCITY = 0.1
= 0.05 m/s
= 2 m/s
3
/s and the pressure control reduces
AIRFLOW
EXHAUST AIR
SENSOR
DAMPER ACTUATOR
F U M
H O
D A M
L
R A
A C T
N E
T
G E
U S
H A
E X
A I R
E N T
I A L
R E
R
L Y
P P
S U
T O
A I R
L A B
EXHAUST
3
0.5 m
/s
2.05
C4076
E X H
A U S
A I R
T
E
O D
P E R
U A T
O R
VELOCITY
SENSOR
M12216

Advertisement

Table of Contents
loading

Table of Contents