Individual Run Summaries - Travis Industries Medium Flush Wood Hybrid Fyre Insert Manual

Travis Industries, Inc.
Model: Medium Flush wood Hybrid Fyre Insert
Report Number:0028WN118E

INDIVIDUAL RUN SUMMARIES

Run 1 - Test procedures followed to produce a high burn rate with a primary air setting of
fully open. Observed burn rate was calculated at 4.80 kg/hr. Emissions results
were calculated using particulate sampling from kindling, start-up fuel, and test
fuel load combined (cold to hot). Burn rate, and efficiency were calculated using
data from the test fuel load only (hot to hot).
Quality checks also found a filter temperature exceeded limits by a maximum of 1
degree for 1 one-minute reading during particulate sampling. An evaluation was
conducted on the data to determine if there was evidence data had been
compromised by a 1-degree limit infraction. Comparing proportional rates and
sample precision between the two sample probes, no evidence was found that
would show a 1-degree infraction caused any compromise of the data. Negative
filter weights were not found. No additional anomalies occurred, this test run was
determined to be valid and appropriate for inclusion in the weighted average.
Run 2 - Test procedures were followed to produce a low burn rate with a primary air
setting of full closed. Observed burn rate was calculated at 0.93 kg/hr. Emissions
and efficiency results were calculated using a hot to hot burn cycle, a coal bed
generated by the high burn procedure was used. Negative filter weights were not
found. No sampling anomalies occurred, this test run was determined to be valid
and appropriate for inclusion in the weighted average.
Run 4 - Test procedures were followed to produce a medium high burn rate with a
primary air setting of 0.50" (1/2") open. Observed burn rate was calculated at 1.38
kg/hr. Emissions and efficiency results were calculated using a hot to hot burn
cycle, a coal bed generated by the high burn procedure was used, no particulate
sampling occurred during this high burn. Quality checks also found a filter
temperature exceeded limits by a maximum of 1 degree for 1 reading during
particulate sampling. An evaluation was conducted on the data to determine if
there was evidence data had been compromised by a 1-degree limit infraction.
Comparing proportional rates and sample precision between the two sample
probes, no evidence was found that would show a 1-degree infraction caused any
compromise of the data. Negative filter weights were not found. No additional
sampling anomalies occurred, this test run was determined to be valid and
appropriate for inclusion in the weighted average.
6 of 236