OCULUS Pentacam Interpretation Manual page 192

26 Important studies and case reports
Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam® system on posterior corneal assess-
„ „
ment in the normal human eye – (Davie Chen, Andrew K.C. Lam, PhD, FAAO) - J Cataract Refract
Surg. 2007; 33:448–454. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.008
Keratoconus: It Is Hard to Define, But – (Michael W. Belin, MD, and Stephen S. Khachikian, MD) -
„ „
Elsevier INC. 2007
2006
Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: Tomographic indices to detect
„ „
keratoconus – (Renato Ambrosio Jr, MD, PhD, Ruiz Simonato Alonso, MD, Allan Luz, MD, Luis
Guillermo Coca Velarde, DSc) - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1851–1859
Changes in the posterior cornea after laser in situ Keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy
„ „
– (Joseph B. Ciolino, MD, Michael W. Belin, MD) - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1426–1431
doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.03.037
Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam® comprehensive eye
„ „
scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound Pachymetry – (Omur Ozlenen
Ucakhan, MD, Muhip Ozkan, PhD, Ayfer Kanpolat, MD) - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:970–
977. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.037
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Rotating Scheimpflug Camera,
„ „
Ultrasonic Pachymetry, and Scanning-Slit Corneal Topography – (Shiro Amano, MD Norihiko
Honda, MD Yuki Amano, MD Satoru Yamagami, MD Takashi Miyai, MD Tomokazu Samejima,
COT Miyuki Ogata, COT Kazunori Miyata, MD) - American Academy of Ophthalmology 2006.
doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.063
Progressão da espessura corneana do ponto mais fino em direção ao limbo: estudo de uma
„ „
população normal e de portadores de ceratocone para criação de valores de referência; Corneal
thickness progression from the thinnest point to the limbus: study based on a normal and a
keratoconus population to create reference values – (Allan Luz, Mário Ursulio, Daniel Castañeda,
Renato Ambrósio Jr) - Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006; 69(4):579-83
Comparison of Three Methods of Measuring Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth –
„ „
(Wolf Buehl, MD, Danijela Stojanac, MD, Stefan Sacu, MD, Wolfgang Drexler, MD, Oliver Findl,
MD) - American Journal of Ophthalmology 8 January 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.048
2005
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement With Pentacam®,
„ „
Orbscan, and Ultrasound – (Birgit Lackner, MD, Gerald Schmidinger, MD, Stefan Pieh, MD,
Martin A. Funovics, MD and Christian Skorpik, MD) - Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 82, No.
10, October 2005
Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam® Scheimpflug system, optical
„ „
low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound Pachymetry – (Yaniv Barkana, MD,
Yariv Gerber, PhD, Uri Elbaz, MD, Shulamit Schwartz, MD, Gie Ken-Dror, MSc, Isaac Avni, MD,
David Zadok, MD) - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:1729–1735. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.058
Agreement and Repeatability of Central Thickness Measurement in Normal Corneas Using
„ „
Ultrasound Pachymetry and the OCULUS Pentacam® - (O'Donnell, Clare PhD, MCOptom, FAAO;
Maldonado-Codina, Carole PhD, MCOptom, FAAO) - 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
190