Preparing A Calibration Curve; %T Versus Concentration Calibration - Hach DR2400 Manual

Hide thumbs Also See for DR2400:
Table of Contents

Advertisement

3.5 Preparing a Calibration Curve

3.5.1 %T Versus Concentration Calibration

5940022ChemAnal.fm
Use sensitivity when comparing different methods. For example, Hach has three
DR/2400 methods for determining iron:
Iron Analysis
Portion of Curve
Method
FerroVer
FerroZine
TPTZ
Notice that the FerroZine method has the greatest sensitivity of the three
methods because it will measure the smallest change in concentration. The
technical definition of sensitivity comes from a calibration curve with Abs on the
x-axis and concentration on the y-axis.
1. If the calibration is a line, the sensitivity is the slope of the line multiplied
by 0.010.
2. If the calibration is a curve, the sensitivity is the slope of the tangent line to the
curve at the concentration of interest multiplied by 0.010.
The sensitivity value is also used as an estimate of the lower limit of the test. The
value may be used as a starting point in determining MDL.
1. Prepare five or more standards of known concentration that cover the
expected range of the test. Run tests as described in the procedure on each
prepared standard. Then pour the customary volume of each known
solution into a separate clean sample cell of the type specified for your
instrument.
2. Select the proper wavelength. Standardize (zero) the instrument using an
untreated water sample or a reagent blank, whichever the procedure instructs
you to use.
3. Measure and record the absorbance of the known solutions within the time
constraints detailed in the procedure. To use absorbance vs. concentration, see
Section %T Versus Concentration Calibration.
If measuring %T, use semilogarithmic graph paper and plot %T (vertical scale)
versus concentration (horizontal scale). For Figure 12, iron standard solutions of
0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 mg/L were measured on a Spectronic 20 at 500
nm using half-inch test tubes. Results were plotted and the calibration table
values were extrapolated from the curve (Table 9).
∆Abs
Entire range
0.010
Entire range
0.010
Entire range
0.010
Chemical Analysis
∆Concentration
0.022 mg/L
0.009 mg/L
0.012 mg/L
Chemical Analysis
Page 45

Advertisement

Table of Contents
loading

Table of Contents