Download Print this page
Konica Minolta SLR Brochure
Konica Minolta SLR Brochure

Konica Minolta SLR Brochure

Comparison of digital slr cameras for orthodontic photography

Advertisement

Quick Links

FEATURES
SECTION
Digital photography is now widely used to document orthodontic patients. High quality intra-oral photography depends on a
satisfactory 'depth of field' focus and good illumination. Automatic 'through the lens' (TTL) metering is ideal to achieve both
the above aims. Ten current digital single lens reflex (SLR) cameras were tested for use in intra- and extra-oral photography as
used in orthodontics. The manufacturers' recommended macro-lens and macro-flash were used with each camera. Handling
characteristics, color-reproducibility, quality of the viewfinder and flash recharge time were investigated. No camera took
acceptable images in factory default setting or 'automatic' mode: this mode was not present for some cameras (Nikon,
Fujifilm); led to overexposure (Olympus) or poor depth of field (Canon, Konica-Minolta, Pentax), particularly for intra-oral
views. Once adjusted, only Olympus cameras were able to take intra- and extra-oral photographs without the need to change
settings, and were therefore the easiest to use. All other cameras needed adjustments of aperture (Canon, Konica-Minolta,
Pentax), or aperture and flash (Fujifilm, Nikon), making the latter the most complex to use. However, all cameras produced
high quality intra- and extra-oral images, once appropriately adjusted. The resolution of the images is more than satisfactory
for all cameras. There were significant differences relating to the quality of color reproduction, size and brightness of the
viewfinders. The Nikon D100 and Fujifilm S 3 Pro consistently scored best for color fidelity. Pentax and Konica-Minolta had
the largest and brightest viewfinders.
;
Key words:
Refereed paper
Introduction
Intra- and extra-oral photography are widely used to
document orthodontic patients at the start of treatment
and to monitor treatment progress. The ideal character-
istics for intra- and extra-oral photography for dentistry
and orthodontics in particular, are reproducible magni-
fication of the images, good depth of field and
consistent, homogenous illumination. Ideally, all the
above characteristics should be standardized within one
series of images, as well as consistent over long periods
1,2
of time.
'Depth of field' is defined as the zone of acceptable
sharpness, and extends in front of and behind the point
of focus. For good depth of field in intra-oral photo-
graphy a small aperture (such as f522) should be used.
Consistent exposure at such settings can best be
achieved by automatic 'through the lens' (TTL) meter-
1
ing.
These settings should either be factory pre-set or
should be easily programmable.
Although there are a large number of digital cameras
advertised for use in dental imaging, only Single Lens
Reflex (SLR) cameras consistently fulfill all the above
Address for correspondence: D. Bister, Department of
Orthodontics, 22nd Floor, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation
Trust, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Email: d.bister@doctors.org.uk
#
2006 British Orthodontic Society
Comparison of 10 digital SLR cameras
for orthodontic photography
D. Bister, Faranak Morderai and R. M. Aveling
Department of Orthodontics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 33, 2006, 000–000
parameters. Additionally, SLR cameras allow for 'best
preview' of the proposed image as the viewfinder shows
the object, as it will appear in the eventual image.
In the pre-digital era the 'Yashica Dental Eye' was
produced for intra- and extra-oral photography. This
SLR camera had a 100 mm macro-lens, which was
permanently fixed to the body with a built-in ring-flash. A
macro-lens allows for distortion-free imaging at close
range with high depth of field. The aperture settings were
automatically adjusted when changing the focus from
intra- to extra-oral photography, and was thereby very
user friendly; no changes in camera settings are necessary
between intra- and extra-oral photography. It was also
reasonably priced. The 'Dental Eye', however, will not be
made available in the digital format. In this article, this
camera was used as reference, as it had all the above-
mentioned ideal properties for dental photography.
Digital SLR cameras have only recently become more
affordable. SLR cameras are now subdivided into two
groups: professional and 'prosumer'. The professional
group is more expensive, but usually has a range of
advantageous features over the 'prosumer' group such
as:
1
DOI 10.1179/146531205225021687

Advertisement

loading

Summary of Contents for Konica Minolta SLR

  • Page 1 ‘depth of field’ focus and good illumination. Automatic ‘through the lens’ (TTL) metering is ideal to achieve both the above aims. Ten current digital single lens reflex (SLR) cameras were tested for use in intra- and extra-oral photography as used in orthodontics.
  • Page 2 With regards to the macro-lens and macro-flash the manufacturers’ respective devices were tested. The aim was to assess 10 digital SLR cameras in the low to medium price range (less than 2500 J for the body), the so called ‘prosumer’ models (comparable to the ‘Yashica Dental Eye’) with manufacturers’...
  • Page 3 JO September 2006 Features Section Comparison of digital SLR cameras Pentax only produced the 100 mm macro-lens at the time of testing,); Olympus only produces a 50 mm macro-lens, which takes magnification differences between analogue and digital formats into account.
  • Page 4 D. Bister et al. Figure 2 (a,b) Depth of field at aperture 4 and 32; please note variation of focus on teeth original computer generated ‘SpyderPRO’ by ColorVision were also ‘anonymised’ and assessed by two operators (F.M. and D.B.) for color reproduction. Neither of the assessors were color blind.
  • Page 5 Comparison of digital SLR cameras Olympus Olympus Pentax E300 *ist DS ED 50 mm ED 50 mm 100 mm SRF - 11 SRF - 11 AF 140 C...
  • Page 6 D. Bister et al. situations with little light and the other half are dedicated for situations with normal and bright light, hence increasing the ‘dynamic range’ of the sensor. However, for all but the ‘maximum dynamic range’ settings only half of the pixels are used, resulting in 6 million effective pixels.
  • Page 7 Generally, color profiling cameras is often only achievable for specialist equip- ment: even professional 36 mm SLR cameras edit or ‘color render’ images (ISO22028-1), thereby interpret- ing/assuming the characteristics of a pleasing appear- ance of the image.
  • Page 8 Models are being replaced at a rapid pace, and industry may eventually develop a digital SLR dedicated for dental use, which is easy to use with the standard settings, such as the ‘Yashica Dental Eye’.
  • Page 9 Authors Queries Journal: Journal of Orthodontics Paper: 3338 Title: Comparison of 10 digital SLR cameras for orthodontic photography Dear Author During the preparation of your manuscript for publication, the questions listed below have arisen. Please attend to these matters and return this form with your proof. Many thanks for your assistance...

This manual is also suitable for:

7d