Abbott Proclaim 3660 Clinician Manual page 59

Implantable pulse generator
Table of Contents

Advertisement

Figure 13. Percentage reduction (≥30% responder rate) in overall VAS score at week 24 from
baseline
Data for paresthesia coverage at both 12 and 24 weeks were available for 73 subjects. More than
half of the subjects (45 out of 73 [61.6%]) were paresthesia-free using burst stimulation, while
only 2 subjects (2.7%) were paresthesia-free using tonic stimulation. In addition, 89.0% of
subjects (65/73) experienced a reduction in paresthesia or no paresthesia with burst stimulation
compared to tonic stimulation. The following table summarizes these results.
Table 31. Summary of paresthesia mapping with burst and tonic stimulation
Cross-Tabulation of Paresthesia by Stimulation Mode
Stimulation mode
Burst
Subjects with Reduction of Paresthesia
Reduction of 100% (No paresthesia)
Reduction of 1%–99%
No Reduction
Paresthesia
No
2/73 (2.7%)
Yes
0/73 (0.0%)
Overall
2/73 (2.7%)
Tonic
No
Yes
45/73 (61.6%)
26/73(35.6%)
71/73 (97.3%)
55
Overall
47/73 (64.4%)
26/73 (35.6%)
45/73 (61.6%)
20/73 (27.4%)
8/73 (11.0%)

Hide quick links:

Advertisement

Table of Contents
loading

Table of Contents