Siemens A70 User Manual page 23

Hide thumbs Also See for A70:
Table of Contents

Advertisement

left page (24)
of A70 Dorado, 140mm, us-en, A31008-H2770-A1-4-7619 (05.10.2005, 12:27)
24
U.S. FDA
development used animals that had al-
ready been treated with cancer-causing
chemicals, and other studies exposed the
animals to the RF virtually continuously –
up to 22 hours per day.
For the past five years in the United
States, the mobile phone industry has
supported research into the safety of mo-
bile phones. This research has resulted in
two findings in particular that merit addi-
tional study:
1. In a hospital-based, case-control study,
researchers looked for an association be-
tween mobile phone use and either glio-
ma (a type of brain cancer) or acoustic
neuroma (a benign tumor of the nerve
sheath). No statistically significant associ-
ation was found between mobile phone
use and acoustic neuroma. There was
also no association between mobile
phone use and gliomas when all types of
gliomas were considered together. It
should be noted that the average length
of mobile phone exposure in this study
was less than three years.
When 20 types of glioma were considered
separately, however, an association was
found between mobile phone use and
one rare type of glioma, neuroepithelli-
omatous tumors. It is possible with multi-
ple comparisons of the same sample that
this association occurred by chance.
Moreover, the risk did not increase with
how often the mobile phone was used, or
the length of the calls. In fact, the risk ac-
tually decreased with cumulative hours of
mobile phone use. Most cancer causing
agents increase risk with increased expo-
sure. An ongoing study of brain cancers
by the National Cancer Institute is expect-
ed to bear on the accuracy and repeata-
bility of these results.
1
2. Researchers conducted a large battery
of laboratory tests to assess the effects of
exposure to mobile phone RF on genetic
material. These included tests for several
kinds of abnormalities, including muta-
tions, chromosomal aberrations, DNA
strand breaks, and structural changes in
the genetic material of blood cells called
lymphocytes. None of the tests showed
any effect of the RF except for the micro-
nucleus assay, which detects structural ef-
fects on the genetic material. The cells in
this assay showed changes after exposure
to simulated cell phone radiation, but only
after 24 hours of exposure. It is possible
that exposing the test cells to radiation for
this long resulted in heating. Since this as-
say is known to be sensitive to heating,
heat alone could have caused the abnor-
malities to occur. The data already in the
literature on the response of the micronu-
cleus assay to RF are conflicting. Thus fol-
low-up research is necessary.
FDA is currently working with govern-
ment, industry, and academic groups to
ensure the proper follow-up to these
industry-funded research findings. Col-
laboration with the Cellular Telecommu-
nications Industry Association (CTIA) in
particular is expected to lead to FDA pro-
viding research recommendations and
scientific oversight of new CTIA-funded
research based on such recommenda-
tions.
Two other studies of interest have been
reported recently in the literature:
• Two groups of 18 people were exposed
to simulated mobile phone signals un-
der laboratory conditions while they
performed cognitive function tests.
There were no changes in the subjects'
ability to recall words, numbers, or pic-
tures, or in their spatial memory, but
they were able to make choices more
quickly in one visual test when they
were exposed to simulated mobile
phone signals. This was the only
change noted among more than
20 variables compared.
2
3

Advertisement

Table of Contents
loading

Table of Contents