carrying case, and an f/6.4 focal reducer
which is highly recommended for imaging.
The focuser does accommodate a larger
2-inch star diagonal if desired. I would have
preferred that the 2-inch visual back be
equipped with a compression ring instead of
the older school thumb screws as this would
further help prevent possible oscillation of
the diagonal. Compression rings tend to
secure diagonals a bit more solidly than set
screws alone and also help prevent set screw
marring of the diagonal barrel.
These observations took place on June
19, 2007, from Pasadena, California. Seeing
conditions on this evening were about 7 out
of 10 and nice enough to conduct some
good observations of deep sky objects as well
as planets. I started my first observations on
Vega in order to check collimation and star
test the instrument. The collimation was
dead perfect, while the optics exhibited just
a bit of under-correction.
My first observations started with a
Televue 22-mm Panoptic eyepiece. This pro-
duced a magnification of 82x, and framed
M8, the Lagoon nebula, very nicely. The
emission nebula exhibits an ample number
of stars for demonstrating the full field per-
formance of the VICAC, and, to my sur-
prise, these were pinpoint from nearly edge
to edge and proved to be much tighter than
those produced by the Schmidt-Cassegrains
I’ve tested in the past. I then slipped in a 2-
inch star diagonal and my 35-mm Televue
Panoptic eyepiece for a magnification of 51x,
and, once again, the stars were pin point
from nearly edge to edge.
One thing that really stood out while
focusing the image was the actual focuser
itself. The VISAC’s stock focuser is one of
the smoothest I’ve ever tested and I really
liked it; in fact it felt even nicer than the
focuser on my 6-inch Takahashi refractor.
Two other observers who were present dur-
ing this observation agreed that the rack and
pinion focuser was exceptional.
Jupiter was pretty well placed at this
point, so I decided to put in some higher
magnification using a Pentax 10-mm XW
eyepiece to yield 180x. Although the deep
sky images were quite wonderful, the size of
the central obstruction was a bit less favor-
able for teasing out optimum contrast of the
features of Jupiter. Jupiter however still