Performance Comparisons; Tpc-C Performance; Spec Performance - HP 124708-001 - ProLiant Cluster - 1850 Introduction Manual
The intel processor roadmap for industry-standard servers technology brief, 10 edition
Hide thumbs
Also See for 124708-001 - ProLiant Cluster - 1850:
- Implementation manual (26 pages) ,
- Troubleshooting manual (18 pages) ,
- Installation manual (2 pages)
Table of Contents
Advertisement
Performance comparisons
TPC-C performance
The Transaction Processing Performance Council benchmark TPC-C results for Woodcrest,
Clovertown, Tulsa, Nehalem, and Dunnington processors are compared in Figure 14. TPC-C is
measured in transactions per minute (tpmC).
Figure 14. TPC-C performance for Intel processors showing percentage improvements compared to Woodcrest
SPEC performance
The Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) CPU2006 benchmark provides
performance measurements that can be used to compare compute-intensive workloads on different
computer systems. SPEC results for Woodcrest, Clovertown, Tulsa, Tigerton, and Nehalem processors
are compared in Figure 15. SPEC CPU2006 contains two benchmark suites: CINT2006 for
measuring and comparing compute-intensive integer performance; CFP2006 for measuring and
comparing compute-intensive floating point performance. The performance results show that the four-
core processors—Clovertown, Tigerton, and Nehalem—performed better in the SPEC tests.
20
Advertisement
Table of Contents
